Speed up test DBs and reduce memory footprint#10167
Draft
Conversation
857e6ab to
cbda309
Compare
cbda309 to
64b6390
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Combination of independent experiments validated on parallel feature/tweak-db-* branches under standard ARM runners. Per-job memory peaks were captured by the upgraded memory_monitor.sh.
Changes:
fsync=off,synchronous_commit=off,full_page_writes=off; MySQL--innodb-flush-log-at-trx-commit=0,--innodb-doublewrite=0,--skip-log-bin. CI databases are ephemeral so durability has no value but fsync overhead is real. Test runtime: mysql8 -23%, postgres12 -26%.docker statsand prints a system+per-container peak summary at run end (visible at the bottom of every CI job log).Combined wall-clock saving on shard jobs alone: ~2000s across the full matrix. Stability either equal or improved (5/40 failures vs 10/43 baseline on the standard runners; 8-core runners should clear those timeout-driven retries).
What changed?
Describe what has changed in this PR.
Why?
Tell your future self why have you made these changes.
How did you test it?
Potential risks
Any change is risky. Identify all risks you are aware of. If none, remove this section.