Skip to content

feat: improve report skill score from 44% to 95%#4

Open
yogesh-tessl wants to merge 1 commit into
sourcegraph:publicfrom
yogesh-tessl:improve/skill-review-optimization
Open

feat: improve report skill score from 44% to 95%#4
yogesh-tessl wants to merge 1 commit into
sourcegraph:publicfrom
yogesh-tessl:improve/skill-review-optimization

Conversation

@yogesh-tessl
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey @sjarmak 👋

this is really impressive work. The 20 skills cover the full benchmarking lifecycle in a very practical way, from task mining to trace evaluation and cost reporting. The ir-analysis and mcp-audit skills especially stand out as thoughtful additions. Having a skills README.md alongside .claude/commands also shows real commitment to making the repo easy for agents to discover, understand, and use.

ran your skills through tessl skill review at work and found some targeted improvements. Here's the full before/after:

Skill Before After Change
report 44% 95% +51%

The report skill had the most headroom. It was missing explicit trigger guidance and a structured workflow, which dragged its score down despite having solid domain content underneath.

Changes made to report skill
  • Expanded frontmatter description with domain context (CodeScaleBench, baseline vs MCP) and an explicit "Use when..." clause with natural trigger terms (benchmark results, cost breakdowns, config comparisons, MCP impact analysis, pass-rate summaries)
  • Added a 4-step reporting workflow - verify run completion → generate report → compare configs → review for anomalies - so the agent follows a sensible sequence instead of picking commands at random
  • Replaced flat command list with a decision table mapping each reporting goal to the right command, making it easy to pick the correct script
  • Tightened scope bullets to be more specific about what this skill handles (benchmark runs, token spending by model/suite, baseline vs MCP comparisons)
  • Preserved all domain terminology - MCP, Sourcegraph, oracle, baseline, IR, dual verification - untouched

quick honest disclosure. I work at https://github.com/tesslio where we build tooling around skills like these. Not a pitch, just saw room for improvement and wanted to contribute.

if you want to self-improve your skills, or define your own scenarios to pressure test, just ask your agent (Claude Code, Codex, etc.) to evaluate and optimize your skill with Tessl. Ping me @yogesh-tessl, if you hit any snags.

Hey @sjarmak 👋

I ran your skills through `tessl skill review` at work and found some targeted improvements. Here's the full before/after:

| Skill | Before | After | Change |
|-------|--------|-------|--------|
| report | 44% | 95% | **+51%** |
| audit | 69% | — | — |
| evaluate | 59% | — | — |
| infra | 54% | — | — |
| next | 56% | — | — |
| run | 71% | — | — |
| scaffold | 59% | — | — |
| status | 73% | — | — |
| triage | 62% | — | — |

The `report` skill had the most headroom — it was missing explicit trigger guidance and a structured workflow, which dragged its score down despite having solid domain content underneath.

<details>
<summary>Changes made to <code>report</code> skill</summary>

- **Expanded frontmatter description** with domain context (CodeScaleBench, baseline vs MCP) and an explicit "Use when..." clause with natural trigger terms (`benchmark results`, `cost breakdowns`, `config comparisons`, `MCP impact analysis`, `pass-rate summaries`)
- **Added a 4-step reporting workflow** — verify run completion → generate report → compare configs → review for anomalies — so the agent follows a sensible sequence instead of picking commands at random
- **Replaced flat command list with a decision table** mapping each reporting goal to the right command, making it easy to pick the correct script
- **Tightened scope bullets** to be more specific about what this skill handles (benchmark runs, token spending by model/suite, baseline vs MCP comparisons)
- **Preserved all domain terminology** — MCP, Sourcegraph, oracle, baseline, IR, dual verification — untouched

</details>

I also stress-tested your `run` skill against a few real-world task evals and it held up really well on paired baseline+MCP execution with multi-account orchestration guardrails. Kudos for that.

Honest disclosure — I work at @tesslio where we build tooling around skills like these. Not a pitch — just saw room for improvement and wanted to contribute.

Want to self-improve your skills? Just point your agent (Claude Code, Codex, etc.) at [this Tessl guide](https://docs.tessl.io/evaluate/optimize-a-skill-using-best-practices) and ask it to optimize your skill. Ping me — [@yogesh-tessl](https://github.com/yogesh-tessl) — if you hit any snags.

Thanks in advance 🙏
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant