Conversation
CorporalCleg
requested review from
Matvezy,
SkalskiP,
isaacrob-roboflow and
probicheaux
as code owners
|
|
|
Any news about this? We're using clearml for model and dataset tracking and it would help a lot with visibility during training. |
CorporalCleg
force-pushed
the
clearml_support
branch
from
17380df to
f808b0f
Compare
|
To change the author(I commited from my machine using another nickname) I was necessary to change commit history (to sign the license) |
|
@CorporalCleg could you pls do a |
CorporalCleg
force-pushed
the
clearml_support
branch
from
74a5db0 to
77cd0bd
Compare
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #520 +/- ##
======================================
- Coverage 59% 58% -0%
======================================
Files 50 50
Lines 6434 6489 +55
======================================
+ Hits 3766 3776 +10
- Misses 2668 2713 +45 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@Borda is there any thing else to be done or is it just awaiting review now? So far we decided to use tensorboard which has its own issues with deprecated pkg_resources package but we'd like to use clearml. |
|
@Borda, are there any new issues? |
* clearml log * docs: add ClearML logging documentation * fix(pre-commit): 🎨 auto format pre-commit hooks --------- Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: jirka <6035284+Borda@users.noreply.github.com>
4 participants
I have read the CLA Document and I sign the CLA.
Description
Added clearml support for logging experiments.
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
How has this change been tested, please provide a testcase or example of how you tested the change?
training code tested with clearml logging
Any specific deployment considerations
Code is 100% compatible with the original
Docs
Docs are written as for W&B logging