Skip to content

Conversation

@wrongsahil
Copy link
Member

@wrongsahil wrongsahil commented Jan 5, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added a small debugging message that may appear in application logs or console during module initialization.

Note: This release contains primarily internal development changes with minimal user-facing impact.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Walkthrough

A single top-level console.log("Testing2") statement was added to src/rq-proxy.ts and will execute during module initialization. No control flow, error handling, exported/public declarations, or other functional logic were changed.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title is vague and does not clearly describe the actual change made in the pull request, which is adding a console.log statement for testing purposes. Consider using a more descriptive title that explains what the change does, such as 'Add test logging statement to rq-proxy module' or 'Add console output for testing in rq-proxy.ts'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2622e62 and daafa76.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/rq-proxy.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/rq-proxy.ts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@requestly/requestly-proxy@84

commit: daafa76

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Fix all issues with AI Agents 🤖
In @src/rq-proxy.ts:
- Line 10: Remove the leftover debug console.log by deleting the top-level
console.log("Testing") statement in the module initialization of src/rq-proxy.ts
so the module no longer prints to stdout on import; locate the stray console.log
call and remove it (no replacement needed).
📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5e99a5d and 2622e62.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/rq-proxy.ts

src/rq-proxy.ts Outdated
import GlobalStateProvider, {State} from "./components/proxy-middleware/middlewares/state";


console.log("Testing");
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Remove debug console.log statement before merging.

The console.log("Testing") statement appears to be leftover debug code executed during module initialization. This will pollute stdout every time the module is imported and should be removed.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @src/rq-proxy.ts around line 10, Remove the leftover debug console.log by
deleting the top-level console.log("Testing") statement in the module
initialization of src/rq-proxy.ts so the module no longer prints to stdout on
import; locate the stray console.log call and remove it (no replacement needed).

@wrongsahil wrongsahil closed this Jan 6, 2026
@wrongsahil wrongsahil deleted the test-pr-for-pkg.pr.new branch January 6, 2026 04:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants