Conversation
Contributor
Contributor
🛡️ Jit Security Scan Results
✅ No security findings were detected in this PR
Security scan by Jit
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Note
Low Risk
Low risk documentation-only change; no code or behavior is modified.
Overview
Adds a new Limitations section to
replica-ha.mdclarifying that replica HA cannot recover a shard pair if the nodes hosting a primary shard and its replica fail at the same time, and notes this scenario is relevant only when quorum is still maintained (for example, 5+ node clusters).Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 4047946. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.