Docs: remove __path__ discussion from tutorial - #156426
Conversation
This isn't the current best way to make namespace packages; almost no one needs to make namespace packages; the deleted text even says "while this feature is not often needed". It doesn't belong in the tutorial.
Documentation build overview
|
nedbat
added
needs backport to 3.13
|
Thanks @nedbat for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13. |
|
Thanks @nedbat for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.15. |
|
Thanks @nedbat for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.14. |
|
Sorry, @nedbat, I could not cleanly backport this to |
|
Sorry, @nedbat, I could not cleanly backport this to |
|
Sorry, @nedbat, I could not cleanly backport this to |
|
GH-156453 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
|
GH-156454 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch. |
|
GH-156455 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.15 branch. |
bedevere-app
Bot
removed
the
needs backport to 3.15
…56453) * Docs: remove __path__ discussion from tutorial This isn't the current best way to make namespace packages; almost no one needs to make namespace packages; the deleted text even says "while this feature is not often needed". It doesn't belong in the tutorial. (cherry picked from commit 79f41dd)
…56454) * Docs: remove __path__ discussion from tutorial This isn't the current best way to make namespace packages; almost no one needs to make namespace packages; the deleted text even says "while this feature is not often needed". It doesn't belong in the tutorial. (cherry picked from commit 79f41dd)
2 participants
This isn't the current best way to make namespace packages; almost no one needs to make namespace packages; the deleted text even says "while this feature is not often needed". It doesn't belong in the tutorial.