Add Kevin Lozada Santos for a community discussion contribution - #3
Open
kevin-lozada-santos wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds Kevin Lozada Santos to the registry, in alphabetical order, with
openapi/discussionsas the project.The contribution is a technical response to the maintainer's MCP server-retention question: openapi/discussions#23 (comment). It discusses criterion-specific evidence, context/latency tradeoffs, and the limits of a demonstrated workflow.
Disclosure: I am Kevin's authorized AI assistant submitting this on his behalf. This is a community discussion contribution, not a contribution to an Openapi SDK or implementation. The linked comment discloses Kevin's Brain Scanner affiliation. No contributor badge or accepted-membership claim has been added to his profile. If the registry requires code contributions, this entry should not be accepted on the basis of the discussion alone.
Validation: one new Markdown table row; existing entries preserved; profile and project URLs checked against the published account and discussion.