Expand API docs and add CHANGELOG #256
Closed
+954
−9
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
@SwayamInSync This is what I have time for today, feel free to take this further again |
Member
|
Thanks @juntyr , I'll check it out. |
Member
|
Hey @juntyr can you transfer this PR to new repo? |
juntyr
added a commit
to juntyr/numpy-quaddtype
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2026
Based on numpy/numpy-user-dtypes#256 Co-authored-by: swayaminsync <[email protected]>
Contributor
Author
|
Superseded by numpy/numpy-quaddtype#49 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
API docs and CHANGELOG for the docs, based on @SwayamInSync work. I reviewed the API docs carefully, including all numerical values, and used KaTex for better maths rendering. I also cleaned up the CHANGELOG a bit, though I'm less confident about that one (so I'd be happy to drop it for now). I briefly reviewed the docs index page but didn't edit it further, so follow-ups might want to adjust the cards based on what guides we write