docs(release): 3.4.0 notes - #426
Merged
Merged
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Benchmark
Details
| Benchmark suite | Current: 361ebe3 | Previous: 99c1b16 | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
benchmarks/test_guard_by_type.py::test_g16_resolve_by_type |
3063961.670576989 iter/sec (stddev: 2.518632743401784e-8) |
2661551.2361682355 iter/sec (stddev: 8.900700263320233e-8) |
0.87 |
benchmarks/test_guard_by_type.py::test_g17_resolve_by_type_large_registry |
3143528.3490209747 iter/sec (stddev: 1.9858661089049954e-8) |
2709424.491954162 iter/sec (stddev: 9.267446501841643e-8) |
0.86 |
benchmarks/test_guard_cold.py::test_g8_cold_first_resolve |
23939.143296329705 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000005888833887647335) |
23636.730258898464 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000004903387116470051) |
0.99 |
benchmarks/test_guard_cold.py::test_g8b_cold_first_resolve_cached |
18360.325912056644 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000005583139279885764) |
17819.255992501494 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000007782069622592584) |
0.97 |
benchmarks/test_guard_concurrency.py::test_g14_concurrent_cached_hit[1] |
429.471515629567 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0000996366099995001) |
403.90639386840263 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000048720262476707166) |
0.94 |
benchmarks/test_guard_concurrency.py::test_g14_concurrent_cached_hit[2] |
401.1391309183431 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0000410182775921761) |
365.9811438726735 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00020839883886446156) |
0.91 |
benchmarks/test_guard_concurrency.py::test_g14_concurrent_cached_hit[4] |
371.507368920635 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00003556444862453793) |
331.9301359790148 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00026775065608392214) |
0.89 |
benchmarks/test_guard_concurrency.py::test_g15_concurrent_first_resolve[1] |
2280.4963363433694 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000018748910964663452) |
2232.560424015914 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000035134623207008466) |
0.98 |
benchmarks/test_guard_concurrency.py::test_g15_concurrent_first_resolve[2] |
1705.8937891195235 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00002889546084369682) |
1702.8723340999109 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000036653443856347336) |
1.00 |
benchmarks/test_guard_concurrency.py::test_g15_concurrent_first_resolve[4] |
1178.7543554595336 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00003089775385137529) |
1170.9010481668545 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00004840752309782305) |
0.99 |
benchmarks/test_guard_lifecycle.py::test_g6_build_child_container |
754254.9501667524 iter/sec (stddev: 4.651706803810463e-8) |
744476.648643634 iter/sec (stddev: 4.920219581006143e-8) |
0.99 |
benchmarks/test_guard_lifecycle.py::test_g6b_build_child_container_auto_scope |
675364.2551789446 iter/sec (stddev: 7.95254268047865e-8) |
689216.1654816811 iter/sec (stddev: 2.838341705281566e-8) |
1.02 |
benchmarks/test_guard_lifecycle.py::test_g7_request_lifecycle_batch |
2352.504572230266 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000016344317571360954) |
2340.793841147439 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000012081117597925936) |
1.00 |
benchmarks/test_guard_lifecycle.py::test_g7c_event_loop_floor_control |
62315.03987597284 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0000016828053278879454) |
61289.77587398854 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0000019855056985759595) |
0.98 |
benchmarks/test_guard_lifecycle.py::test_g13_teardown_at_scale |
45949.34245349079 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0000019731338858419234) |
45735.78824510214 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0000022288941747460207) |
1.00 |
benchmarks/test_guard_resolve.py::test_g1_transient_resolve |
2033095.129123418 iter/sec (stddev: 2.9182938619915903e-8) |
2014328.1173343842 iter/sec (stddev: 2.3612239147239873e-8) |
0.99 |
benchmarks/test_guard_resolve.py::test_g2_cached_resolve |
3435613.375858038 iter/sec (stddev: 6.806471850482239e-9) |
3259325.5660110055 iter/sec (stddev: 9.396166101125413e-9) |
0.95 |
benchmarks/test_guard_resolve.py::test_g3_deep_chain |
751813.745964064 iter/sec (stddev: 3.026162118054409e-8) |
732707.4851292095 iter/sec (stddev: 3.875451551364374e-8) |
0.97 |
benchmarks/test_guard_resolve.py::test_g4_wide_resolve |
392347.281959492 iter/sec (stddev: 1.291228333228367e-7) |
398926.8150602975 iter/sec (stddev: 1.2196205029055555e-7) |
1.02 |
benchmarks/test_guard_resolve.py::test_g5_cross_scope |
1621948.9922977835 iter/sec (stddev: 3.7835728155078135e-8) |
1631096.0635286337 iter/sec (stddev: 2.2244800292348367e-8) |
1.01 |
benchmarks/test_guard_resolve.py::test_g9_context_resolve |
824043.190577652 iter/sec (stddev: 2.946188711908947e-8) |
842854.2145411115 iter/sec (stddev: 3.174588546140589e-8) |
1.02 |
benchmarks/test_guard_resolve.py::test_g12_override_active_resolve |
504025.94503623305 iter/sec (stddev: 4.759268974301172e-8) |
498938.9688618574 iter/sec (stddev: 6.989942913426486e-8) |
0.99 |
benchmarks/test_guard_resolve.py::test_g18_alias_hop |
2498770.9170571747 iter/sec (stddev: 1.0773436374296299e-8) |
2319960.2934186044 iter/sec (stddev: 1.4191400383893832e-8) |
0.93 |
benchmarks/test_guard_validate.py::test_g10_validate_deep_chain |
28091.402156354143 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000003339463299166824) |
27982.154511562923 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000004147676652951062) |
1.00 |
benchmarks/test_guard_validate.py::test_g11_validate_wide |
17047.411317113092 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000004185207243961972) |
17057.513820061897 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000004212995056827875) |
1.00 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Release notes for the unreleased work since the
3.3.0tag: #425 (scope derivation + the compiled context resolver), #424 (docs/architecture removal), #423 (comparative table republish).Version choice is 3.4.0, and it is worth a look: #425 removes
ContextProvider.resolveand makesprovider.scoperead-only. Both are removals of machinery that was never a designed extension point, which is the same class as the provider-type closure that shipped as a minor in 2.29.0 under a## Breaking changeheading — so this follows that precedent rather than treating it as a major. Say the word if you'd rather it were 4.0.0 or 3.3.1 and I'll rename the file and adjust the framing.No code changes.
just lint-ciclean (planning/index.py --check,planning/links.pyboth OK).