Skip to content

Add VerdictSwarm - Multi-agent crypto token risk scanner#3789

Open
vswarm-ai wants to merge 1 commit intomodelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
vswarm-ai:add-verdictswarm
Open

Add VerdictSwarm - Multi-agent crypto token risk scanner#3789
vswarm-ai wants to merge 1 commit intomodelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
vswarm-ai:add-verdictswarm

Conversation

@vswarm-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

VerdictSwarm MCP Server

Repository: https://github.com/sentien-labs/verdictswarm-mcp
PyPI: https://pypi.org/project/verdictswarm-mcp/
Website: https://vswarm.io

What it does

6 AI agents independently analyze and debate crypto token risk before reaching consensus. Each agent specializes in a different aspect (Security, Market, Community, Tokenomics, Technical Analysis, Risk Assessment) and they debate their findings across multiple rounds.

Features

  • Rug pull detection, security audits, holder concentration analysis
  • Supports Solana, Ethereum, Base, BSC
  • Free tier (no API key needed)
  • Sub-second cached responses
  • 5 MCP tools + 2 resources + 2 prompts

Install

pip install verdictswarm-mcp

Added under Community Servers in alphabetical order.

6 AI agents independently analyze and debate crypto token risk.
Rug pull detection, security audits, holder concentration analysis.
Supports Solana, Ethereum, Base, BSC.
@vswarm-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thanks for the review! The Glama listing at https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/sentien-labs/verdictswarm-mcp correctly points to https://github.com/sentien-labs/verdictswarm-mcp (same repo as this PR).

The Glama badge is already in the README (line 7):

[![sentien-labs/verdictswarm-mcp MCP server](https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/sentien-labs/verdictswarm-mcp/badge)](https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/sentien-labs/verdictswarm-mcp)

The repo is under the sentien-labs org (our company namespace). The PR was submitted from the vswarm-ai account (product namespace) which may have caused the confusion. Both orgs are ours.

Let me know if anything else is needed!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants