Add AMDGPU execution provider support

[aditya-dl]

Add AMD GPU (MIGraphX) execution provider support to ONNX Runtime GenAI. The provider is exposed as "amdgpu" to users and maps to the MIGraphX EP in ONNX Runtime internally.

Changes:

• Create src/amdgpu/session_options.{h,cpp} with AppendExecutionProvider that tries V2 plugin path then falls back to V1 legacy API
• Add provider name normalization ("amdgpu" -> "AMDGPU") and register in the dispatch table
• Enable graph capture for AMDGPU to allow compiled graph reuse during token generation
• Add static input shape padding (prompt_gen_ flag) so the EP avoids recompilation on varying prompt lengths. Gated behind NeedsStaticInputShapes() to only activate for AMDGPU, not other EPs
• Fix input_ids padding to handle both int32 and int64 element types, and correct per-row copy for batch_size > 1
• Fix position_ids padding to prevent out-of-bounds read on next_tokens when tensor shape is padded to max_length for batch_size > 1

Configuration:
"provider_options": [{ "amdgpu": {} }] or: config.append_provider("amdgpu")

Known limitations:

• Beam search not supported (requires past_present_share_buffer=true which requires num_beams=1)
• Inputs allocated on CPU; the MIGraphX EP handles CPU<->GPU transfers internally

[microsoft-github-policy-service]

@aditya-dl please read the following Contributor License Agreement(CLA). If you agree with the CLA, please reply with the following information.

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree [company="{your company}"]

Options:

• (default - no company specified) I have sole ownership of intellectual property rights to my Submissions and I am not making Submissions in the course of work for my employer.

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

• (when company given) I am making Submissions in the course of work for my employer (or my employer has intellectual property rights in my Submissions by contract or applicable law). I have permission from my employer to make Submissions and enter into this Agreement on behalf of my employer. By signing below, the defined term “You” includes me and my employer.

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft"

Contributor License Agreement

Contribution License Agreement

This Contribution License Agreement (“Agreement”) is agreed to by the party signing below (“You”),
and conveys certain license rights to Microsoft Corporation and its affiliates (“Microsoft”) for Your
contributions to Microsoft open source projects. This Agreement is effective as of the latest signature
date below.

1. Definitions.
   “Code” means the computer software code, whether in human-readable or machine-executable form,
   that is delivered by You to Microsoft under this Agreement.
   “Project” means any of the projects owned or managed by Microsoft and offered under a license
   approved by the Open Source Initiative (www.opensource.org).
   “Submit” is the act of uploading, submitting, transmitting, or distributing code or other content to any
   Project, including but not limited to communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control
   systems, and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the Project for the purpose of
   discussing and improving that Project, but excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or
   otherwise designated in writing by You as “Not a Submission.”
   “Submission” means the Code and any other copyrightable material Submitted by You, including any
   associated comments and documentation.
2. Your Submission. You must agree to the terms of this Agreement before making a Submission to any
   Project. This Agreement covers any and all Submissions that You, now or in the future (except as
   described in Section 4 below), Submit to any Project.
3. Originality of Work. You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your original work.
   Should You wish to Submit materials that are not Your original work, You may Submit them separately
   to the Project if You (a) retain all copyright and license information that was in the materials as You
   received them, (b) in the description accompanying Your Submission, include the phrase “Submission
   containing materials of a third party:” followed by the names of the third party and any licenses or other
   restrictions of which You are aware, and (c) follow any other instructions in the Project’s written
   guidelines concerning Submissions.
4. Your Employer. References to “employer” in this Agreement include Your employer or anyone else
   for whom You are acting in making Your Submission, e.g. as a contractor, vendor, or agent. If Your
   Submission is made in the course of Your work for an employer or Your employer has intellectual
   property rights in Your Submission by contract or applicable law, You must secure permission from Your
   employer to make the Submission before signing this Agreement. In that case, the term “You” in this
   Agreement will refer to You and the employer collectively. If You change employers in the future and
   desire to Submit additional Submissions for the new employer, then You agree to sign a new Agreement
   and secure permission from the new employer before Submitting those Submissions.
5. Licenses.

• Copyright License. You grant Microsoft, and those who receive the Submission directly or
  indirectly from Microsoft, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license in the
  Submission to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, and distribute
  the Submission and such derivative works, and to sublicense any or all of the foregoing rights to third
  parties.
• Patent License. You grant Microsoft, and those who receive the Submission directly or
  indirectly from Microsoft, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license under
  Your patent claims that are necessarily infringed by the Submission or the combination of the
  Submission with the Project to which it was Submitted to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell and
  import or otherwise dispose of the Submission alone or with the Project.
• Other Rights Reserved. Each party reserves all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
  No additional licenses or rights whatsoever (including, without limitation, any implied licenses) are
  granted by implication, exhaustion, estoppel or otherwise.

6. Representations and Warranties. You represent that You are legally entitled to grant the above
   licenses. You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your original work (except as You may
   have disclosed under Section 3). You represent that You have secured permission from Your employer to
   make the Submission in cases where Your Submission is made in the course of Your work for Your
   employer or Your employer has intellectual property rights in Your Submission by contract or applicable
   law. If You are signing this Agreement on behalf of Your employer, You represent and warrant that You
   have the necessary authority to bind the listed employer to the obligations contained in this Agreement.
   You are not expected to provide support for Your Submission, unless You choose to do so. UNLESS
   REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING, AND EXCEPT FOR THE WARRANTIES
   EXPRESSLY STATED IN SECTIONS 3, 4, AND 6, THE SUBMISSION PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS
   PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTY OF
   NONINFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
7. Notice to Microsoft. You agree to notify Microsoft in writing of any facts or circumstances of which
   You later become aware that would make Your representations in this Agreement inaccurate in any
   respect.
8. Information about Submissions. You agree that contributions to Projects and information about
   contributions may be maintained indefinitely and disclosed publicly, including Your name and other
   information that You submit with Your Submission.
9. Governing Law/Jurisdiction. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Washington, and
   the parties consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the federal courts sitting in King County,
   Washington, unless no federal subject matter jurisdiction exists, in which case the parties consent to
   exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the Superior Court of King County, Washington. The parties waive all
   defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction and forum non-conveniens.
10. Entire Agreement/Assignment. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties, and
    supersedes any and all prior agreements, understandings or communications, written or oral, between
    the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement may be assigned by Microsoft.

[kunal-vaishnavi]

Why name the provider as AMDGPU instead of MIGraphX?

[aditya-dl]

Moving forward, we're renaming the EP to AMDGPU Execution Provider. Internally, OGA maps "AMDGPU" to "MIGraphX" when communicating with ORT, so there are no ORT-side changes needed. Users configure "amdgpu": {} in their genai_config.json or call config.append_provider("amdgpu").

[baijumeswani]

Why not rename it inside ORT as well? Having multiple names is a problem because there are multiple components that are execution provider aware (including foundry local and foundry local catalog). It would be problematic if on the surface it appeared that the name is AMDExecutionProvider but when we query OrtGetEpDevices, it returns MIGraphXExecutionProvider?
If the name needs to change, it should change in ort as well.

[kunal-vaishnavi]

A boolean called is_prompt_ already exists for detecting the prefill stage when updating the input ids.

onnxruntime-genai/src/models/input_ids.cpp

Lines 84 to 94 in f185537

	// For beam search
	if (is_prompt_ && state_.params_->search.num_beams > 1) {
	int row_size = static_cast<int>(shape_[1]);
	for (int b = 0; b < shape_[0]; b++) {
	int in_offset = (b / state_.params_->search.num_beams) * row_size;
	int out_offset = b * row_size;
	data_span.subspan(out_offset, row_size).CopyFrom(new_tokens.subspan(in_offset, row_size));
	}
	} else {
	data_span.CopyFrom(new_tokens);
	}

Can we set the correct input ids when constructed rather than doing it here right before the model runs?

[aditya-dl]

The current approach pads in State::Run() because the padding needs to be coordinated across input_ids, position_ids, and logits - all three must be padded to the same max_length for the shapes to be consistent. Moving input_ids padding to DefaultInputIDs::Update() would require scattering the padding logic across three separate classes (input_ids, position_inputs, logits) rather than keeping it centralized.
Also, is_prompt_ is currently used for beam search token duplicating - overloading it for static shape padding could be confusing.
That said, if you feel the architectural separation is important, we can refactor to move each padding into its respective Update() function. Let me know your thoughts.

[kunal-vaishnavi]

Typically, we have used enabling or disabling graph capture to decide on static vs dynamic shapes. Can we use that rather than introducing new boolean feature flags such as prompt_gen_?

[aditya-dl]

We considered using use_graph_capture but it's also true for DML and WebGPU. Gating the static input padding behind use_graph_capture would cause DML/WebGPU to also pad inputs to max_length during prompt processing, which they don't need. They handle static shapes through their own mechanisms (DML has ep.dml.enable_graph_capture session config, WebGPU checks enableGraphCapture provider option). The prompt_gen_ flag, gated behind NeedsStaticInputShapes(), ensures the padding only activates for AMDGPU without affecting other EPs.
Let me know if my understanding is right.

[baijumeswani]

How come the execution provider has a different name when using append execution provider v1 vs v2?

[baijumeswani]

As I mentioned above, this has consequences on other layers in the stack (such as foundry local and foundry local catalog). Please unify the naming.

[aditya-dl]

@baijumeswani Thank you for the feedback on naming consistency. We understand the concern.

A larger AMDGPU execution provider effort is underway. We are open-sourcing the plugin EP that will use the AMDGPU name consistently across the stack. This PR is the initial OGA-side integration to support that direction.

The MIGraphX name will be retained in legacy ORT for backward compatibility. Once the plugin EP is available, the naming will be unified end-to-end.