Skip to content

feat(release): beachball esrp release#693

Open
pavelglac wants to merge 10 commits into
mainfrom
pavelglac-beachball-esrp-release
Open

feat(release): beachball esrp release#693
pavelglac wants to merge 10 commits into
mainfrom
pavelglac-beachball-esrp-release

Conversation

@pavelglac

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@pavelglac
pavelglac force-pushed the pavelglac-beachball-esrp-release branch from dce0811 to 2def5a3 Compare July 14, 2026 15:49
@pavelglac pavelglac changed the title Pavelglac beachball esrp release feat(release): beachball esrp release Jul 15, 2026
Comment thread .azure-devops/graphitation-release.yml
@pavelglac
pavelglac force-pushed the pavelglac-beachball-esrp-release branch from 0867f95 to cff6a3f Compare July 16, 2026 10:00
Comment thread .azure-devops/graphitation-release.yml
@pavelglac

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Test package will be removed once I will be able to publish package (currently I need to wait a few hours to use new beachball version).

- script: |
releaseBranch="origin/${BUILD_SOURCEBRANCH#refs/heads/}"
yarn beachball publish -b "$releaseBranch" -t latest -y --registry $(adoNpmFeedBaseUrl) --no-push --keep-change-files
displayName: Release to the ADO npm feed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's confusing a bit: in job "Build" we now have steps for release, and then we have a separate "Release" job

Comment thread package.json
"@babel/core": "^7.14.0",
"@babel/preset-typescript": "^7.14.0",
"beachball": "^2.47.1",
"beachball": "3.0.0-alpha.4",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we upgrade to this alpha version?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, we need to have pack-to-path option

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants