Document CodeRabbit CLI review defaults - #4
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Central YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Disabled knowledge base sources:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe CodeRabbit review skill documentation now shows the default agent review command, documents output and type defaults, and adds scope examples for Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
✨ Simplify code
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@plugins/coderabbit/skills/coderabbit-review/SKILL.md`:
- Around line 45-56: The example "coderabbit review --agent -t all" redundantly
specifies -t all while the docs already state that `--type` defaults to `all`;
either remove `-t all` from the example so it reads "coderabbit review --agent"
or (if you want explicit clarity) keep the example but add a short parenthetical
like "(-t all shown for clarity; all is the default)" and ensure the explanatory
line that says "`--type` defaults to `all`" remains accurate; update the
surrounding text referencing `--type`/`-t` so there is no contradiction.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Central YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: a2cc0f47-b9e5-4007-9669-47f3e01dd512
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
plugins/coderabbit/skills/coderabbit-review/SKILL.md
📜 Review details
🔇 Additional comments (1)
plugins/coderabbit/skills/coderabbit-review/SKILL.md (1)
57-93: LGTM!The "Common scopes and comparisons" examples are clear and well-structured, demonstrating useful command variations. The Output Handling, Result Format, and Guardrails sections provide comprehensive operational guidance with appropriate detail.
This pull request updates the documentation for the
coderabbit reviewcommand to clarify its usage, especially when using the--agentflag. The changes make it easier to understand the default behaviors and options for running reviews with different scopes.Documentation improvements for review commands:
coderabbit reviewproduces plain text output by default, while--agentswitches output to structured findings for agent workflows.--type(-t) flag defaults toall, covering committed, staged, unstaged, and untracked changes.Summary by CodeRabbit