Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 3, 2026

📄 19% (0.19x) speedup for ListOperation.packCreate in client/src/com/aerospike/client/cdt/ListOperation.java

⏱️ Runtime : 707 milliseconds 595 milliseconds (best of 5 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

Runtime improvement: the optimized version runs ~18% faster (707 ms → 595 ms) by reducing repeated virtual calls and field reads in a tight, hot helper method.

What changed

  • Cached repeated values into locals:
    • order.getFlag(pad) → int flag
    • order.attributes → int attributes
  • Marked the local packer reference final (packer was already local; final signals intent and helps JIT in some cases).
  • Kept the two-pass packing algorithm (size calculation via createBuffer then writing) identical — only micro-optimizations were applied.

Why this speeds things up

  • Each order.getFlag(pad) and order.attributes access in the original code required either a virtual method dispatch or a field load off the order object. The original method called/loaded them twice (once during the size calc pass and once during the write pass). By hoisting them into local primitives, we:
    • Remove repeated virtual call overhead and repeated memory loads.
    • Give the JIT/optimizer a better chance to inline and keep values in registers (fewer memory indirections).
    • Reduce CPU cycles per call (important in tight loops or high-throughput scenarios).
  • These are classic micro-optimizations for small, frequently-invoked helpers: the savings per invocation are small, but they accumulate, producing the observed ~18% total runtime gain.

Behavior and trade-offs

  • No functional change: the packing logic and external API are unchanged.
  • No meaningful memory/regression trade-off was introduced; this change is purely a performance micro-optimization.
  • The improvement is most relevant when packCreate is on a hot path (many calls). If packCreate is rare, the absolute gain will be small but still positive.

Best-fit workloads / tests

  • Workloads that repeatedly create list CDT buffers (many operations per second, hot paths) benefit the most.
  • Microbenchmarks and high-throughput client code that frequently call this helper will see the largest relative improvement.
  • Regression tests remain valid because behavior is unchanged; the annotated tests (none listed) should continue to pass.

Summary
Caching two values (flag and attributes) prevents duplicate virtual/field accesses across the two packing passes, letting the JIT produce tighter, faster code and yielding the measured 18% runtime reduction without changing behavior.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 49 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage No coverage data found for packCreate
⚙️ Click to see Existing Unit Tests

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-ListOperation.packCreate-ml6pq2dx and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

Runtime improvement: the optimized version runs ~18% faster (707 ms → 595 ms) by reducing repeated virtual calls and field reads in a tight, hot helper method.

What changed
- Cached repeated values into locals:
  - order.getFlag(pad) → int flag
  - order.attributes → int attributes
- Marked the local packer reference final (packer was already local; final signals intent and helps JIT in some cases).
- Kept the two-pass packing algorithm (size calculation via createBuffer then writing) identical — only micro-optimizations were applied.

Why this speeds things up
- Each order.getFlag(pad) and order.attributes access in the original code required either a virtual method dispatch or a field load off the order object. The original method called/loaded them twice (once during the size calc pass and once during the write pass). By hoisting them into local primitives, we:
  - Remove repeated virtual call overhead and repeated memory loads.
  - Give the JIT/optimizer a better chance to inline and keep values in registers (fewer memory indirections).
  - Reduce CPU cycles per call (important in tight loops or high-throughput scenarios).
- These are classic micro-optimizations for small, frequently-invoked helpers: the savings per invocation are small, but they accumulate, producing the observed ~18% total runtime gain.

Behavior and trade-offs
- No functional change: the packing logic and external API are unchanged.
- No meaningful memory/regression trade-off was introduced; this change is purely a performance micro-optimization.
- The improvement is most relevant when packCreate is on a hot path (many calls). If packCreate is rare, the absolute gain will be small but still positive.

Best-fit workloads / tests
- Workloads that repeatedly create list CDT buffers (many operations per second, hot paths) benefit the most.
- Microbenchmarks and high-throughput client code that frequently call this helper will see the largest relative improvement.
- Regression tests remain valid because behavior is unchanged; the annotated tests (none listed) should continue to pass.

Summary
Caching two values (flag and attributes) prevents duplicate virtual/field accesses across the two packing passes, letting the JIT produce tighter, faster code and yielding the measured 18% runtime reduction without changing behavior.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from misrasaurabh1 February 3, 2026 14:47
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Feb 3, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants