Skip to content

fix(template): standalone mode should skip externalClusters#760

Merged
itay-grudev merged 2 commits intocloudnative-pg:mainfrom
ArnaudTA:fix/null-external-clusters
Mar 5, 2026
Merged

fix(template): standalone mode should skip externalClusters#760
itay-grudev merged 2 commits intocloudnative-pg:mainfrom
ArnaudTA:fix/null-external-clusters

Conversation

@ArnaudTA
Copy link
Contributor

@ArnaudTA ArnaudTA commented Dec 18, 2025

@dosubot dosubot bot added size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. chart( cluster ) Related to the cluster chart labels Dec 18, 2025
@ArnaudTA ArnaudTA force-pushed the fix/null-external-clusters branch from c70eece to 5401c65 Compare December 18, 2025 23:39
ankitml added a commit to paradedb/charts that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2025
Updated to match upstream PR cloudnative-pg#760 which fixes the same issue:
- Moved externalClusters field inside conditional in template
- Reverted cluster.yaml to unconditional include
- Preserved ParadeDB-specific custom externalClusters feature

This minimizes future rebase conflicts with upstream while
maintaining backward compatibility with ParadeDB's custom
external cluster configuration.

Related: cloudnative-pg#760
@ArnaudTA ArnaudTA force-pushed the fix/null-external-clusters branch from 66b3102 to b36317e Compare January 21, 2026 00:30
@ArnaudTA
Copy link
Contributor Author

Up plz

@silanosa
Copy link

@itay-grudev Could we please get this merged and released? This would fix the externalClusters bug we're facing with Helm version 4. It would be greatly appreciated.

Signed-off-by: ArnaudTa <33383276+ArnaudTA@users.noreply.github.com>
@hairmare
Copy link

Hi CNPG community

Is there any chance we could get Helm v4 support soon?

Pretty please 👉👈

@mprimeaux
Copy link

Is there a timeline on when this will be merged? Hoping to have #756 addressed.

@silanosa
Copy link

silanosa commented Feb 23, 2026

@itay-grudev @gbartolini This PR would unblock Helm 4 deployments and is relatively small in size. Is there a reason that this, but also other PRs, are rarely reviewed and merged lately by the chart maintainers? Is this due to time constraints or is the general idea to stop relying on the CNPG helm charts and rather use CNPG K8s resources directly for our deployments?

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Mar 5, 2026
@itay-grudev itay-grudev merged commit 7a617a2 into cloudnative-pg:main Mar 5, 2026
19 checks passed
@ArnaudTA
Copy link
Contributor Author

ArnaudTA commented Mar 5, 2026

Thank you !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

chart( cluster ) Related to the cluster chart lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants