FINERACT-2436: Fix Client Trends by Week or Month don't work on Postgresql

[Kengne-yvana]

Description

Describe the changes made and why they were made. (Ignore if these details are present on the associated Apache Fineract JIRA ticket.)

Checklist

Please make sure these boxes are checked before submitting your pull request - thanks!

• Write the commit message as per our guidelines
• Acknowledge that we will not review PRs that are not passing the build ("green") - it is your responsibility to get a proposed PR to pass the build, not primarily the project's maintainers.
• Create/update unit or integration tests for verifying the changes made.
• Follow our coding conventions.
• Add required Swagger annotation and update API documentation at fineract-provider/src/main/resources/static/legacy-docs/apiLive.htm with details of any API changes
• This PR must not be a "code dump". Large changes can be made in a branch, with assistance. Ask for help on the developer mailing list.

Your assigned reviewer(s) will follow our guidelines for code reviews.

[Kengne-yvana]

This change is to make sure FINERACT uses postgresql and MySQL when needed without breaking the code . Having the same author and path but different id. I added database-specific Liquibase contexts to ensure the correct SQL dialect is applied without affecting existing MySQL installations. This fix replaces MySQL-specific functions (WEEK, MONTHNAME) with ISO-standard functions (EXTRACT, TO_CHAR) for PostgreSQL environments, while maintaining the same author and file path for traceability.

[galovics]

Whats the reason for changing an existing changelog file?

[Kengne-yvana]

@galovics I choose to add the fix to this file because that's where my research let me to which is where the reports where updated for Mysql .

[IOhacker]

@Kengne-yvana I think that it is better to create a new changelog file. So then the fix will be applied as a new migration.

[Kengne-yvana]

@IOhacker thanks for your review
sorry for the late reply. It is due to health issues.

[IOhacker]

@Kengne-yvana I hope you are better now. Please let me know once I can review the PR again :) Thank you

[Kengne-yvana]

@IOhacker yeah, Hello i am back now . Feeling much better. also i will apply all the changes today.
Thanks

[Kengne-yvana]

@IOhacker please i am waiting for your review
Thanks

[adamsaghy]

Can you please add a test case which tests whether the fixed reports are working as expected?

[Kengne-yvana]

sure @adamsaghy

[IOhacker]

LGTM

[adamsaghy]

@Kengne-yvana Kindly asking you to rebase this PR!

[IOhacker]

@Kengne-yvana you have to resolve the conflicts doing a rebase in your local repository. Make sure to squash and commit for sending only 1 commit.

[Kengne-yvana]

@IOhacker that's what i am doing now. thanks

[adamsaghy]

@Kengne-yvana Please review the failing checks!

[IOhacker]

@Kengne-yvana in the Apache Fineract Dev List, there is a post about the recent changes in the GitHub Actions

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2177
#5431