Conversation
Regression Testing ResultsWARNING:root:Initial mole fractions do not sum to one; normalizing. Detailed regression test results.Regression test aromatics:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:55 aromatics Passed Core Comparison ✅Original model has 15 species. aromatics Failed Edge Comparison ❌Original model has 106 species. Non-identical thermo! ❌
thermo: Thermo group additivity estimation: group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)CsCsH) + group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)CsCsH) + group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)CsH) + group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)CsHH) + group(Cds-CdsCsCs) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + polycyclic(s3_4_5_ene_3) + polycyclic(s2_4_5_diene_1_5) + polycyclic(s3_5_5_ene_1) - ring(Cyclobutene) - ring(Cyclopentane) - ring(Cyclopentene) + radical(cyclopentene-allyl) Non-identical thermo! ❌
thermo: Thermo group additivity estimation: group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)CsCsH) + group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)CsH) + group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)CsH) + group(Cs-CsCsHH) + group(Cds-CdsCsCs) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + Estimated bicyclic component: polycyclic(s2_3_5_ane) - ring(Cyclopropane) - ring(Cyclopentane) + ring(Cyclopentene) + ring(Cyclopropane) + polycyclic(s2_3_6_diene_0_3) + Estimated bicyclic component: polycyclic(s3_5_6_ane) - ring(Cyclopentane) - ring(Cyclohexane) + ring(Cyclopentene) + ring(1,4-Cyclohexadiene) - ring(Cyclopropane) - ring(Cyclopentene) - ring(1,4-Cyclohexadiene) + radical(cyclopentene-4) Non-identical thermo! ❌
thermo: Thermo group additivity estimation: group(Cs-CsCsCsH) + group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)CsCsH) + group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)CsCsH) + group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)CsHH) + group(Cds- Cds(Cds-Cds)Cs) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)H) + polycyclic(s2_3_5_ene_1) + polycyclic(s2_3_6_diene_1_3) + Estimated bicyclic component: polycyclic(s3_5_6_ane) - ring(Cyclopentane) - ring(Cyclohexane) + ring(Cyclopentene) + ring(1,3-Cyclohexadiene) - ring(Cyclopropane) - ring(Cyclopentene) - ring(1,3-Cyclohexadiene) + radical(cyclopentene-allyl) Non-identical thermo! ❌
Identical thermo comments: Non-identical kinetics! ❌
kinetics: Non-identical kinetics! ❌
kinetics: Non-identical kinetics! ❌
kinetics: Non-identical kinetics! ❌
kinetics: Non-identical kinetics! ❌
kinetics: DetailsObservables Test Case: Aromatics Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.500 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! aromatics Passed Observable Testing ✅Regression test liquid_oxidation:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:56 liquid_oxidation Failed Core Comparison ❌Original model has 37 species. liquid_oxidation Failed Edge Comparison ❌Original model has 214 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: liquid_oxidation Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! liquid_oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅Regression test nitrogen:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:01 nitrogen Passed Core Comparison ✅Original model has 41 species. nitrogen Failed Edge Comparison ❌Original model has 133 species. Non-identical thermo! ❌
thermo: Thermo group additivity estimation: group(O2s-CdN3d) + group(N3d-OCd) + group(Cd-HN3dO) + ring(Cyclopropene) + radical(CdJ-NdO) Non-identical kinetics! ❌
kinetics: DetailsObservables Test Case: NC Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.200 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! nitrogen Passed Observable Testing ✅Regression test oxidation:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:43 oxidation Passed Core Comparison ✅Original model has 59 species. oxidation Passed Edge Comparison ✅Original model has 230 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: Oxidation Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.500 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅Regression test sulfur:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:39 sulfur Passed Core Comparison ✅Original model has 27 species. sulfur Failed Edge Comparison ❌Original model has 89 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: SO2 ComparisonThe following observables did not match: ❌ Observable species O=S=O varied by more than 0.100 on average between old model SO2(15) and new model SO2(15) in condition 1.
sulfur Failed Observable Testing ❌Regression test superminimal:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:25 superminimal Passed Core Comparison ✅Original model has 13 species. superminimal Passed Edge Comparison ✅Original model has 18 species. Regression test RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:51 RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Core Comparison ✅Original model has 13 species. RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Edge Comparison ✅Original model has 13 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Observable Testing ✅Regression test RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:14:43 RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Failed Core Comparison ❌Original model has 35 species. RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Failed Edge Comparison ❌Original model has 77 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅beep boop this comment was written by a bot 🤖 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds a new YAML configuration file defining recommended thermo/kinetics/transport library sets for use by RMG’s “auto” library selection mode (including specialized sets for PAH formation, surface, halogens, and electrochemistry).
Changes:
- Introduces
input/recommended_libraries.ymlwith curated recommended library lists per chemistry type. - Adds additional categorization for CH pyrolysis vs PAH formation and includes surface/electrochem recommendations.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Regression Testing ResultsWARNING:root:Initial mole fractions do not sum to one; normalizing. Detailed regression test results.Regression test aromatics:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:55 aromatics Passed Core Comparison ✅Original model has 15 species. aromatics Failed Edge Comparison ❌Original model has 106 species. Non-identical thermo! ❌
thermo: Thermo group additivity estimation: group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)CsCsH) + group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)CsH) + group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)(Cds-Cds)CsH) + group(Cs-CsCsHH) + group(Cds-CdsCsCs) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + Estimated bicyclic component: polycyclic(s2_3_5_ane) - ring(Cyclopropane) - ring(Cyclopentane) + ring(Cyclopentene) + ring(Cyclopropane) + polycyclic(s2_3_6_diene_0_3) + Estimated bicyclic component: polycyclic(s3_5_6_ane) - ring(Cyclopentane) - ring(Cyclohexane) + ring(Cyclopentene) + ring(1,4-Cyclohexadiene) - ring(Cyclopropane) - ring(Cyclopentene) - ring(1,4-Cyclohexadiene) + radical(cyclopentene-4) Non-identical thermo! ❌
thermo: Thermo group additivity estimation: group(Cs-CsCsCsH) + group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)CsCsH) + group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)CsCsH) + group(Cs-(Cds-Cds)CsHH) + group(Cds- Cds(Cds-Cds)Cs) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-CdsCsH) + group(Cds-Cds(Cds-Cds)H) + polycyclic(s2_3_5_ene_1) + polycyclic(s2_3_6_diene_1_3) + Estimated bicyclic component: polycyclic(s3_5_6_ane) - ring(Cyclopentane) - ring(Cyclohexane) + ring(Cyclopentene) + ring(1,3-Cyclohexadiene) - ring(Cyclopropane) - ring(Cyclopentene) - ring(1,3-Cyclohexadiene) + radical(cyclopentene-allyl) Non-identical kinetics! ❌
kinetics: Non-identical kinetics! ❌
kinetics: Non-identical kinetics! ❌
kinetics: DetailsObservables Test Case: Aromatics Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.500 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! aromatics Passed Observable Testing ✅Regression test liquid_oxidation:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:56 liquid_oxidation Failed Core Comparison ❌Original model has 37 species. liquid_oxidation Failed Edge Comparison ❌Original model has 214 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: liquid_oxidation Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! liquid_oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅Regression test nitrogen:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:01 nitrogen Failed Core Comparison ❌Original model has 41 species. nitrogen Failed Edge Comparison ❌Original model has 133 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: NC Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.200 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! nitrogen Passed Observable Testing ✅Regression test oxidation:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:43 oxidation Passed Core Comparison ✅Original model has 59 species. oxidation Passed Edge Comparison ✅Original model has 230 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: Oxidation Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.500 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅Regression test sulfur:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:39 sulfur Passed Core Comparison ✅Original model has 27 species. sulfur Failed Edge Comparison ❌Original model has 89 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: SO2 ComparisonThe following observables did not match: ❌ Observable species O=S=O varied by more than 0.100 on average between old model SO2(15) and new model SO2(15) in condition 1.
sulfur Failed Observable Testing ❌Regression test superminimal:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:25 superminimal Passed Core Comparison ✅Original model has 13 species. superminimal Passed Edge Comparison ✅Original model has 18 species. Regression test RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:51 RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Core Comparison ✅Original model has 13 species. RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Edge Comparison ✅Original model has 13 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Observable Testing ✅Regression test RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:14:43 RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Failed Core Comparison ❌Original model has 35 species. RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Failed Edge Comparison ❌Original model has 77 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅beep boop this comment was written by a bot 🤖 |
Regression Testing ResultsWARNING:root:Initial mole fractions do not sum to one; normalizing. Detailed regression test results.Regression test aromatics:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:55 aromatics Passed Core Comparison ✅Original model has 15 species. aromatics Passed Edge Comparison ✅Original model has 106 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: Aromatics Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.500 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! aromatics Passed Observable Testing ✅Regression test liquid_oxidation:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:56 liquid_oxidation Failed Core Comparison ❌Original model has 37 species. liquid_oxidation Failed Edge Comparison ❌Original model has 214 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: liquid_oxidation Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! liquid_oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅Regression test nitrogen:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:01 nitrogen Failed Core Comparison ❌Original model has 41 species. nitrogen Failed Edge Comparison ❌Original model has 133 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: NC Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.200 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! nitrogen Passed Observable Testing ✅Regression test oxidation:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:01:43 oxidation Passed Core Comparison ✅Original model has 59 species. oxidation Passed Edge Comparison ✅Original model has 230 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: Oxidation Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.500 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅Regression test sulfur:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:39 sulfur Passed Core Comparison ✅Original model has 27 species. sulfur Failed Edge Comparison ❌Original model has 89 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: SO2 ComparisonThe following observables did not match: ❌ Observable species O=S=O varied by more than 0.100 on average between old model SO2(15) and new model SO2(15) in condition 1.
sulfur Failed Observable Testing ❌Regression test superminimal:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:00:25 superminimal Passed Core Comparison ✅Original model has 13 species. superminimal Passed Edge Comparison ✅Original model has 18 species. Regression test RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:02:51 RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Core Comparison ✅Original model has 13 species. RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Edge Comparison ✅Original model has 13 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! RMS_constantVIdealGasReactor_superminimal Passed Observable Testing ✅Regression test RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation:Reference: Execution time (DD:HH:MM:SS): 00:00:14:43 RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Failed Core Comparison ❌Original model has 35 species. RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Failed Edge Comparison ❌Original model has 77 species. DetailsObservables Test Case: RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Comparison✅ All Observables varied by less than 0.100 on average between old model and new model in all conditions! RMS_CSTR_liquid_oxidation Passed Observable Testing ✅beep boop this comment was written by a bot 🤖 |
JacksonBurns
left a comment
JacksonBurns
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't know enough about the specifics of the chemistry to really comment on that, but I will say that adding some documentation about why these libraries were chosen for these types of chemistry would be helpful for users. I don't know the best place for, but I think inline comments on this file or further additions to the docs as you started in the Pair PR here would be good.
mjohnson541
left a comment
mjohnson541
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here's at least an initial look over.
|
|
||
| oxidation: | ||
| thermo: | ||
| - FFCM1(-) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why FFCM1(-) here for oxidation and Klippenstein_Glarborg2016 for CH_pyrolysis_core?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
right, I think I can remove Klippenstein_Glarborg2016, it's superseded by NOx2018
| thermo: | ||
| - NOx2018 | ||
| - Butadiene_Dimerization | ||
| - CurranPentane |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CurranPentane and some of these other libraries beg the question for me: How safe do we want to play these recommendations? Some these are libraries are not rock solid, but are much more likely to help than hurt...but users aren't going to inherently know which of these libraries are pure-calculations, which are super well validated and which involve lots of estimates so they may assume that what we recommended is rock solid.
| transport: [] | ||
|
|
||
| surface: | ||
| thermo: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we're running on Pt111 is RMG smart enough to ignore surfaceThermoLi?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have no idea re surface libs, @rwest, could you please comment?
| - surfaceThermoPt111 | ||
| - surfaceThermoNi111 | ||
| kinetics: | ||
| - name: Surface/CPOX_Pt/Deutschmann2006_adjusted |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we think these surface kinetics libraries are safe enough to put in our recommendations?
|
|
||
| electrochem: | ||
| thermo: | ||
| - LithiumPrimaryThermo |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I need to check these thermo libraries in more detail.
To be used with the auto database feature ReactionMechanismGenerator/RMG-Py#2909
Reviewers: Please see that this PR makes sense in terms of the chemistry and library correctness, let me know if you have other recommendations. Also, please double check the details of the surface libraries implementation in this file, I'm not fluent inthat.
(Also, I see that we have a
LithiumSurfaceas well as asurfaceThermoLithermo library. It's confusing, maybe rename or unite [in another PR]?)