docs: add missing doxygen comment for par_nosync_t::on()

[Oxygen56]

Summary

• Adds the missing Doxygen //! comment on thrust::cuda::par_nosync_t::on() method
• The comment matches the existing documentation on the sibling par_t::on() method exactly
• Addresses the documentation inconsistency reported in [BUG]: Documentation for thrust::cuda::par_nosync.on missing #5453

Fixes #5453

Test Plan

• Comment format matches project Doxygen style
• Change is consistent with par_t::on() documentation

[copy-pr-bot]

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 2773414d-6987-4579-b185-4acf32bb4dd1

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ba66046 and 415e31b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• thrust/thrust/system/cuda/detail/execution_policy.h

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• thrust/thrust/system/cuda/detail/execution_policy.h

---

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated internal developer documentation comments; no functional or user-facing changes.

suggestion:

Walkthrough

A Doxygen comment was added to document par_nosync_t.on(cudaStream_t), indicating it sets the CUDA stream for algorithms executed with this policy. No code or API signatures were changed.

Changes

par_nosync_t Documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
par_nosync_t stream documentation thrust/thrust/system/cuda/detail/execution_policy.h	Doxygen comment added to describe the par_nosync_t.on(cudaStream_t) method that configures the CUDA stream for execution.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Add documentation for thrust::cuda::par_nosync.on method [#5453]	✅

Out-of-scope changes

No out-of-scope changes detected. The modification is limited to adding documentation for the par_nosync_t.on() method as required by the linked issue.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[bernhardmgruber]

/ok to test ba66046

[bernhardmgruber]

/ok to test aa93378

[bernhardmgruber]

/ok to test 97151a9

[bernhardmgruber]

@Oxygen56 please don't merge main, since CI runs are rather expensive, and rerunning failed PRs is often cheaper. Now the CI passed and I can't merge the PR because of the merge commit :S

[bernhardmgruber]

/ok to test 490ec1a

[Oxygen56]

@bernhardmgruber Sorry about that! I've cleaned up the branch — force-pushed a single clean commit without the merge commits. CI should run cleanly now. Thanks for the approval and your patience!

[github-actions]

😬 CI Workflow Results

🟥 Finished in 2h 47m: Pass: 91%/116 | Total: 4d 06h | Max: 2h 28m | Hits: 26%/923873

See results here.