Skip to content

chore: sync Mergify JSON Schema files - #12272

Merged
mergify[bot] merged 1 commit into
Mergifyio:mainfrom
mergify-ci-bot:json-schema-types-sync
Jul 30, 2026
Merged

chore: sync Mergify JSON Schema files#12272
mergify[bot] merged 1 commit into
Mergifyio:mainfrom
mergify-ci-bot:json-schema-types-sync

Conversation

@mergify-ci-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Synchronizing Mergify JSON Schema files. This PR is automatically generated by the schemas-sync workflow.

@mergify
mergify Bot deployed to Mergify Merge Protections July 30, 2026 12:54 Active
@mergify

mergify Bot commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merge Protections

🟢 All 6 merge protections satisfied — ready to merge.

Show 6 satisfied protections

🟢 🤖 Continuous Integration

  • all of:
    • check-success = build
    • check-success = lint
    • check-success = test
    • any of:
      • check-success = test-broken-links
      • label = ignore-broken-links
    • any of:
      • -head-repo-full-name~=^Mergifyio/
      • check-success=Cloudflare Pages

🟢 👀 Review Requirements

  • any of:
    • author = mergify-ci-bot
    • #approved-reviews-by >= 2
    • author = dependabot[bot]

🟢 Enforce conventional commit

Make sure that we follow https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/

  • title ~= ^(fix|feat|internal|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|build|ci|chore|revert|ui)(?:\(.+\))?!?:

🟢 🔎 Reviews

  • #changes-requested-reviews-by = 0
  • #review-requested = 0
  • #review-threads-unresolved = 0

🟢 📕 PR description

  • body ~= (?ms:.{48,})

🟢 🚦 Auto-queue

When all merge protections are satisfied, this pull request will be queued automatically.

@mergify

mergify Bot commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merge Queue Status

  • Entered queue2026-07-30 12:57 UTC · Rule: automated updates · triggered by merge protections
  • Checks skipped · PR is already up-to-date
  • Merged2026-07-30 13:03 UTC · at afaa217766c22d19f7fcdcc617632634499c9c7b · fast-forward

This pull request spent 5 minutes 36 seconds in the queue, including 3 seconds running CI.

Required conditions to merge

@mergify mergify Bot added the queued label Jul 30, 2026
@mergify
mergify Bot merged commit afaa217 into Mergifyio:main Jul 30, 2026
9 checks passed
@mergify mergify Bot removed the queued label Jul 30, 2026
mergify Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
`mergify-ci-bot` satisfies the "👀 Review Requirements" merge protection with
**zero** approvals and is auto-queued through the `automated updates` lane.
That is right for the deterministic syncers in `Mergifyio/ci-bot` — a changelog
copy or a JSON-schema sync needs no reviewers — and wrong for the scheduled
docs agent, which opens pull requests full of prose a model wrote.

Nothing but the draft flag holds that line today. The agent opens drafts only
(`draft: always-true`, not overridable at runtime), so a human must act before
anything lands; but the moment someone marks one ready, it can merge with no
approval on it at all. ci-bot#282 merged today, which armed the Monday 06:00
Europe/Paris health audit, so this wants to land first.

Both bots push from the same fork (`mergify-ci-bot/docs`), so `author` and
`head-repo-full-name` cannot tell them apart. The branch prefix can: the
runner's `scope.py` names every branch `docs-agent/health-audit-<section>` or
`docs-agent/change-watch`, and it is the only place a branch name is minted.

Four rules change, keyed on that prefix so the syncers keep their fast path:

- **`👀 Review Requirements`** — the `mergify-ci-bot` free pass is now
  conditional on the head *not* being a `docs-agent/` branch. Agent pull
  requests fall through to `#approved-reviews-by >= 2`, the same bar as anyone
  else. The `&DefaultReviewCond` anchor is shared, so the hotfix rule tightens
  identically.
- **`automated updates` queue rule** — agent branches are kept out of the
  fast-forward, batch-of-10 lane.
- **`default` queue rule** — and therefore have to be let in here, or they
  would match no queue at all and could not be merged even once approved
  (`auto_merge_conditions: true` auto-queues, then the queue rules route).
  They inherit `squash` and the weekday merge window, like human pull requests.
- **`request review`** — routes agent pull requests to `@devs`, since they now
  need approvals and nothing else would ask for them. Gated on `-draft`, so the
  ten drafts a Monday audit opens do not each ping the team before a human has
  decided one is worth merging.

Not changed: the `automated updates` *priority* rule still matches the agent,
so its pull requests sit at `low` behind human work in the `default` queue.
That reads as correct; say so if it isn't.

## Note on the snippet in the ticket

MRGFY-8340 and `docs-agent/README.md` both propose `-head-ref ~= ^docs-agent/`.
There is no `head-ref` attribute — the 75 condition attributes in
`public/mergify-configuration-schema.json` have `head` ("the name of the branch
where the pull request changes are implemented"). Using `head` here. The
snippet also stopped at two rules; the `default` queue and review routing above
are the rest of the change.

## Validation

- `mergify config validate` on a merge-key-expanded copy of this file: valid.
  (Run against the file as written it reports three pre-existing
  `'<<' was unexpected` errors — the CLI's loader does not resolve YAML merge
  keys. Same three before and after this change.)
- `mergify config simulate https://github.com/Mergifyio/docs/pull/12272` (a real
  `mergify-ci-bot` schema-sync pull request, from the fork) with this config:
  `-head ~= ^docs-agent/` evaluates true, the free pass holds, and `request
  review` stays not-applicable. The syncers are unaffected.
- Same simulation with the regex swapped to `^json-schema-` so that it matches
  #12272's actual head: the free pass collapses, `#approved-reviews-by >= 2`
  becomes the operative condition, and `request review` activates. That is the
  docs-agent path, demonstrated on a real pull request rather than read by eye.
- `pnpm check`: green.

No `docs-agent/` pull request exists yet to simulate against directly — the
first one arrives with the first scheduled run.

MRGFY-8340
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant