Skip to content

Initial filewriter options analysis - #110

Draft
Tom-Willemsen wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
filewriter_evaluation
Draft

Initial filewriter options analysis#110
Tom-Willemsen wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
filewriter_evaluation

Conversation

@Tom-Willemsen

@Tom-Willemsen Tom-Willemsen commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Initial analysis of three filewriter-implementation options: ESS, SuperMuSR, greenfield.

No opinion is formed yet on which option is most suitable; these documents just aim to describe what each option would look like.

@Tom-Willemsen Tom-Willemsen Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mattclarke - sorry to tag you directly on a PR like this, it would great if you had time to look through this ess.md file and tell us where there are areas we're:

  • Understating or overstating the amount of work required, or where we'd run strongly against architectural assumptions
  • Missing mechanisms in the ESS filewriter which you think would be a better fit than what has been described here
  • Overestimating or underestimating the extent of the existing support

Or anything else you feel we are misrepresenting about the ESS filewriter.

@Tom-Willemsen Tom-Willemsen changed the title Initial options analysis Initial filewriter options analysis Aug 28, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant