🚀 feature request
Relevant Rules
whl_library_targets macro in python/private/pypi/whl_library_targets.bzl
Description
When rules_python generates BUILD targets for platform-specific wheels (e.g., torch-2.8.0-cp312-cp312-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl), the resulting py_library does not set target_compatible_with. This means Bazel cannot distinguish platform-specific wheels from pure-Python ones at analysis time.
We maintain a repo that targets both x86_64 and aarch64. Our pyproject.toml uses PEP 508 environment markers to restrict certain dependencies to x86_64:
dependencies = [
"torch==2.8.0; platform_machine == 'x86_64'",
"opencv-python==4.11.0.86; platform_machine == 'x86_64'",
"tensorboard==2.20.0; platform_machine == 'x86_64'",
# ... many more x86_64-only deps
]
We generate separate lock files per platform via uv pip compile. The pip.parse extension correctly fetches platform-specific wheels. However, the generated py_library targets for these wheels have no target_compatible_with constraint.
This causes two issues:
-
bazel build //... fails on aarch64: Bazel attempts to build targets that transitively depend on x86_64-only wheels, which fail because the wheel files don't exist for aarch64. With target_compatible_with, Bazel would instead skip incompatible targets (printing SKIPPED in the build output).
-
Manual target_compatible_with annotations required everywhere: As a workaround, we must add target_compatible_with = ["@platforms//cpu:x86_64"] to every py_test and py_binary that transitively depends on an x86_64-only wheel. This is error-prone and tedious — our repo currently has dozens of such annotations scattered across BUILD files.
Describe the solution you'd like
The whl_library_targets macro should automatically infer target_compatible_with from the wheel filename's platform tag and set it on the generated py_library.
Wheel filenames follow a well-defined format (PEP 427): {distribution}-{version}(-{build tag})?-{python tag}-{abi tag}-{platform tag}.whl. The platform tag encodes the target architecture:
| Platform tag suffix |
Constraint |
_x86_64, _amd64 |
@platforms//cpu:x86_64 |
_aarch64, _arm64 |
@platforms//cpu:aarch64 |
_i686 |
@platforms//cpu:x86_32 |
_ppc64le |
@platforms//cpu:ppc |
_s390x |
@platforms//cpu:s390x |
any (pure-Python) |
(no constraint) |
A possible implementation in whl_library_targets.bzl:
load(":parse_whl_name.bzl", "parse_whl_name")
_PLATFORM_TAG_CPU_MAP = {
"x86_64": "@platforms//cpu:x86_64",
"amd64": "@platforms//cpu:x86_64",
"aarch64": "@platforms//cpu:aarch64",
"arm64": "@platforms//cpu:aarch64",
"i686": "@platforms//cpu:x86_32",
"ppc64le": "@platforms//cpu:ppc",
"s390x": "@platforms//cpu:s390x",
}
def _target_compatible_with_from_whl_name(whl_filename):
if not whl_filename or not whl_filename.endswith(".whl"):
return []
parsed = parse_whl_name(whl_filename)
if parsed.platform_tag == "any":
return []
for suffix, constraint in _PLATFORM_TAG_CPU_MAP.items():
if parsed.platform_tag.endswith("_" + suffix):
return [constraint]
return []
Then in the whl_library_targets function, pass it to py_library:
rules.py_library(
...
target_compatible_with = _target_compatible_with_from_whl_name(name),
...
)
This leverages the existing parse_whl_name utility already available in rules_python.
Describe alternatives you've considered
-
Manual target_compatible_with on downstream targets: This is what we currently do — every py_test/py_binary that transitively depends on an x86_64-only wheel gets a manual target_compatible_with = ["@platforms//cpu:x86_64"]. This is tedious, error-prone, and doesn't scale. Each new test file requires the developer to figure out whether any transitive dependency is platform-specific.
-
Patching rules_python locally via single_version_override: We currently apply a local patch to whl_library_targets.bzl (via single_version_override in MODULE.bazel) that implements the solution described above. This works but is a maintenance burden — we have to keep the patch in sync with upstream rules_python updates.
-
Using pip.parse whl_modifications to post-hoc add target_compatible_with: This would require listing every platform-specific wheel individually and is even more error-prone than option 1.
The information to infer target_compatible_with is already embedded in the wheel filename. Having rules_python set it automatically would eliminate all three workarounds and make cross-platform Bazel builds work correctly out of the box.
🚀 feature request
Relevant Rules
whl_library_targetsmacro inpython/private/pypi/whl_library_targets.bzlDescription
When
rules_pythongenerates BUILD targets for platform-specific wheels (e.g.,torch-2.8.0-cp312-cp312-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl), the resultingpy_librarydoes not settarget_compatible_with. This means Bazel cannot distinguish platform-specific wheels from pure-Python ones at analysis time.We maintain a repo that targets both
x86_64andaarch64. Ourpyproject.tomluses PEP 508 environment markers to restrict certain dependencies to x86_64:We generate separate lock files per platform via
uv pip compile. Thepip.parseextension correctly fetches platform-specific wheels. However, the generatedpy_librarytargets for these wheels have notarget_compatible_withconstraint.This causes two issues:
bazel build //...fails on aarch64: Bazel attempts to build targets that transitively depend on x86_64-only wheels, which fail because the wheel files don't exist for aarch64. Withtarget_compatible_with, Bazel would instead skip incompatible targets (printingSKIPPEDin the build output).Manual
target_compatible_withannotations required everywhere: As a workaround, we must addtarget_compatible_with = ["@platforms//cpu:x86_64"]to everypy_testandpy_binarythat transitively depends on an x86_64-only wheel. This is error-prone and tedious — our repo currently has dozens of such annotations scattered across BUILD files.Describe the solution you'd like
The
whl_library_targetsmacro should automatically infertarget_compatible_withfrom the wheel filename's platform tag and set it on the generatedpy_library.Wheel filenames follow a well-defined format (PEP 427):
{distribution}-{version}(-{build tag})?-{python tag}-{abi tag}-{platform tag}.whl. The platform tag encodes the target architecture:_x86_64,_amd64@platforms//cpu:x86_64_aarch64,_arm64@platforms//cpu:aarch64_i686@platforms//cpu:x86_32_ppc64le@platforms//cpu:ppc_s390x@platforms//cpu:s390xany(pure-Python)A possible implementation in
whl_library_targets.bzl:Then in the
whl_library_targetsfunction, pass it topy_library:This leverages the existing
parse_whl_nameutility already available inrules_python.Describe alternatives you've considered
Manual
target_compatible_withon downstream targets: This is what we currently do — everypy_test/py_binarythat transitively depends on an x86_64-only wheel gets a manualtarget_compatible_with = ["@platforms//cpu:x86_64"]. This is tedious, error-prone, and doesn't scale. Each new test file requires the developer to figure out whether any transitive dependency is platform-specific.Patching
rules_pythonlocally viasingle_version_override: We currently apply a local patch towhl_library_targets.bzl(viasingle_version_overrideinMODULE.bazel) that implements the solution described above. This works but is a maintenance burden — we have to keep the patch in sync with upstreamrules_pythonupdates.Using
pip.parsewhl_modificationsto post-hoc addtarget_compatible_with: This would require listing every platform-specific wheel individually and is even more error-prone than option 1.The information to infer
target_compatible_withis already embedded in the wheel filename. Havingrules_pythonset it automatically would eliminate all three workarounds and make cross-platform Bazel builds work correctly out of the box.