Automated Metadata Quality Report from CodeMetaSoft #2
Description
Hi maintainers,
Your repository is part of our metadata quality improvement initiative. We've automatically analyzed your repository's metadata and discovered some issues that could be fixed.
This automated issue includes:
- Detected metadata pitfalls and warnings
- Suggestions for fixing each issue
Context
This analysis is performed by the CodeMetaSoft project to help improve research software quality.
This is a first initiative aimed at identifying and reporting metadata quality issues across research software repositories.
At this stage, we only provide diagnostics and recommendations.
In future iterations, we plan to propose automated fixes for the detected issues to further simplify the improvement process and reduce manual effort.
Each pitfall and warning is identified by a unique code (e.g. P001 for pitfalls, W004 for warnings) that corresponds to specific metadata quality issues.
You can find more details about these checks and how to address them in the RSMetacheck catalog.
Metadata Quality Report
Repository: https://github.com/SoftwareUnderstanding/ScientificSoftwareKG
Analysis Date: 2026-03-05
sw-metadata-bot version: 0.1.4
RSMetacheck version: 0.2.0
⚠️ Warnings (2)
W002
Evidence: W002 detected: codemeta.json dateModified '2021-06-09T00:00:00' is outdated compared to repository date '2026-02-17T14:51:46'
Suggestion: The data in the metadata file should be updated to be aligned with the date of the latest release. Automating this synchronization as part of your release process is highly recommended.
W004
Evidence: W004 detected: codemeta.json Programming languages without versions: HTML, CSS
Suggestion: Include version numbers for each programming language used. Defining these helps ensure reproducibility and compatibility across systems.
This report was generated automatically by sw-metadata-bot.
If you're not interested in participating, please comment "unsubscribe" and we will remove your repository from our list.