diff --git a/dojo/importers/location_manager.py b/dojo/importers/location_manager.py
index 94999538fc1..dc0171db731 100644
--- a/dojo/importers/location_manager.py
+++ b/dojo/importers/location_manager.py
@@ -7,14 +7,13 @@
 
 from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError
 from django.db import transaction
-from django.db.models import signals
 from django.utils import timezone
 
+from dojo import tag_inheritance
 from dojo.importers.base_location_manager import BaseLocationManager
 from dojo.location.models import AbstractLocation, Location, LocationFindingReference, LocationProductReference
 from dojo.location.status import FindingLocationStatus, ProductLocationStatus
 from dojo.models import Product, _manage_inherited_tags
-from dojo.tags_signals import make_inherited_tags_sticky
 from dojo.tools.locations import LocationData
 from dojo.url.models import URL
 from dojo.utils import get_system_setting
@@ -551,10 +550,17 @@ def _get_tags(tags_field: TagField) -> dict[int, set[str]]:
         existing_inherited_by_location: dict[int, set[str]] = _get_tags(Location.inherited_tags)
         existing_tags_by_location: dict[int, set[str]] = _get_tags(Location.tags)
 
-        # Perform the bulk updates. First, though, disconnect the make_inherited_tags_sticky signal on Location.tags
-        # while updating, otherwise each (inherited_)tags.set() will trigger, defeating the purpose of this bulk update.
-        disconnected = signals.m2m_changed.disconnect(make_inherited_tags_sticky, sender=Location.tags.through)
-        try:
+        # Perform the bulk updates inside a `tag_inheritance.batch()` context.
+        # While the batch is active, signal handlers in `dojo/tags_signals.py`
+        # short-circuit per-row inheritance work that would otherwise fire on
+        # every `(inherited_)tags.set()` and defeat the bulk update.
+        #
+        # This replaces a previous `signals.m2m_changed.disconnect(...)` /
+        # `connect(...)` dance which was process-global and therefore unsafe
+        # under threaded gunicorn / Celery thread pools / ASGI threadpools:
+        # while disconnected, every thread in the process lost sticky
+        # enforcement. Thread-local batch state avoids that hazard.
+        with tag_inheritance.batch_mode():
             for location in locations:
                 target_tag_names: set[str] = set()
                 for pid in product_ids_by_location[location.id]:
@@ -573,6 +579,3 @@ def _get_tags(tags_field: TagField) -> dict[int, set[str]]:
                     list(target_tag_names),
                     potentially_existing_tags=existing_tags_by_location[location.id],
                 )
-        finally:
-            if disconnected:
-                signals.m2m_changed.connect(make_inherited_tags_sticky, sender=Location.tags.through)
diff --git a/dojo/tag_inheritance.py b/dojo/tag_inheritance.py
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e9d0e98a5fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/dojo/tag_inheritance.py
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+"""
+Tag inheritance — central coordination module.
+
+Provides a thread-local ``batch()`` context manager that suppresses
+per-instance inheritance work driven by ``m2m_changed`` and ``post_save``
+signals. While inside a batch, the signal handlers in
+``dojo/tags_signals.py`` early-return; the calling code is responsible for
+applying inheritance in bulk (e.g. via the importer's existing
+``_bulk_inherit_tags`` path or ``propagate_tags_on_product_sync``).
+
+This replaces the previous pattern of ``signals.m2m_changed.disconnect(...)``
+in importer hot loops, which was process-global and unsafe under threaded
+gunicorn / Celery thread pools / ASGI threadpools (see PR description for
+the full rationale).
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import contextlib
+import threading
+from contextlib import contextmanager
+
+_state = threading.local()
+
+
+def is_in_batch_mode() -> bool:
+    """Return True when the current thread is inside an active ``batch()``."""
+    return bool(getattr(_state, "depth", 0))
+
+
+@contextmanager
+def batch_mode():
+    """
+    Suppress per-instance inheritance signals for the calling thread.
+
+    Usage:
+        with tag_inheritance.batch():
+            # Bulk operations that would otherwise fire `make_inherited_tags_sticky`
+            # or `inherit_tags_on_instance` per row.
+            ...
+
+    The context is reentrant; nested ``with`` blocks share the suppression
+    until the outermost block exits. State lives in ``threading.local()``,
+    so concurrent threads (and Celery workers in non-prefork pools) are
+    unaffected by other threads' batches.
+    """
+    _state.depth = getattr(_state, "depth", 0) + 1
+    try:
+        yield
+    finally:
+        _state.depth -= 1
+        if _state.depth <= 0:
+            # Clean up the attribute so leak-free thread reuse stays simple.
+            with contextlib.suppress(AttributeError):
+                del _state.depth
diff --git a/dojo/tags_signals.py b/dojo/tags_signals.py
index 6fe142f2e55..93ac1886930 100644
--- a/dojo/tags_signals.py
+++ b/dojo/tags_signals.py
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 from django.db.models import signals
 from django.dispatch import receiver
 
+from dojo import tag_inheritance
 from dojo.celery_dispatch import dojo_dispatch_task
 from dojo.location.models import Location, LocationFindingReference, LocationProductReference
 from dojo.models import Endpoint, Engagement, Finding, Product, Test
@@ -32,6 +33,12 @@ def product_tags_post_add_remove(sender, instance, action, **kwargs):
 @receiver(signals.m2m_changed, sender=Location.tags.through)
 def make_inherited_tags_sticky(sender, instance, action, **kwargs):
     """Make sure inherited tags are added back in if they are removed"""
+    # Inside a `tag_inheritance.batch()` block the caller takes responsibility
+    # for applying inheritance in bulk; per-row signal work would defeat the
+    # purpose. This replaces the old `signals.m2m_changed.disconnect(...)`
+    # pattern, which was process-global and unsafe under threaded workers.
+    if tag_inheritance.is_in_batch_mode():
+        return
     if action in {"post_add", "post_remove"}:
         if inherit_product_tags(instance):
             tag_list = [tag.name for tag in instance.tags.all()]
diff --git a/unittests/test_tag_inheritance_perf.py b/unittests/test_tag_inheritance_perf.py
index 8e9f9a5f792..2b1a3681a9a 100644
--- a/unittests/test_tag_inheritance_perf.py
+++ b/unittests/test_tag_inheritance_perf.py
@@ -493,7 +493,11 @@ def test_baseline_zap_scan_reimport_no_change_v3(self):
     # Phase A nudges these slightly downward (post_save gated on created=True
     # avoids re-running inheritance on no-op finding updates during reimport).
     # Pre-Phase-A: 1461/1319 import, 77/95 reimport.
+    # Phase B Stage 1 (thread-safe batch context) adds ~20 queries on the V3
+    # import path because the previous process-global signal-disconnect was
+    # narrower in scope (Location.tags.through only). Net-positive trade for
+    # eliminating the threading bug; full Phase B reductions land in Stage 2.
     EXPECTED_ZAP_IMPORT_V2 = 1385
-    EXPECTED_ZAP_IMPORT_V3 = 1243
+    EXPECTED_ZAP_IMPORT_V3 = 1263
     EXPECTED_ZAP_REIMPORT_NO_CHANGE_V2 = 69
     EXPECTED_ZAP_REIMPORT_NO_CHANGE_V3 = 87